People comment on our report of the action by one
presbytery, taking no action on deleting G-6.0106(b) from the Book of Order
Posted on 1-15-03
The comments are posted in the order in which we have
received them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kate Van Brocklin, a student at Union Seminary/PSCE,
sends this response to our report:
As a seminarian prayerfully considering whether to seek ordination in this
denomination or not, I have to say my heart is heavy after hearing of the
events in the Twin Cities Area presbytery.
It's painful as I recall that just a couple of months ago,
I attended the Covenant Network conference in Minneapolis with a renewed
hope that we can work together as a church to become who it is we were
created to be - only to hear now that Tim [Hart-Andersen's] proposed motion,
which he claims to be in the best interest of the GLBT community, was
passed.
I feel it is an inaccurate portrayal of the motion to
claim that it was for the good of our GLBT sisters and brothers in faith.
The reason I know it is not the will of the GLBT community, is because I
have asked them. I feel that the defeat of this motion is in the interest of
the current Covenant Network strategy focusing on the unity of the church
and interpretation of the Book of Order. There are members of the GLBT
community who affirm this strategy and there are many who are strongly
against it. However, one more time, action has been taken to exclude the
GLBT community from leadership in their church in order to challenge this
issue before the church in a legalistic manner.
Obviously Covenant Network believes their strategy is the
one that will "win." I fear they may be the only ones left to be a part of
that celebration.
Being an ally to an oppressed and marginalized community
means listening to their thoughts and desires and empowering them to bring
about change. If true change is to take place, persons of privilege must
stop ignoring the wishes of the very persons they claim to be helping.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This comment comes from Brian
Wells, an elder at First and Franklin Street Church Baltimore, MD
I'm finally able to be angry and disgusted, yet at the same time heartened
by some of the comments I've seen since then. There may be a growing
realization that we must consider CovNet [Covenant Network] simply another
faction that must be strategized - sometimes against - and even manipulated,
but most certainly no longer considered a natural and constant ally.
That's so sad, but we may need to see this as one of those
things that my partner and I refer to as "happy / sad" things with our son.
As he grows up, our 8 year old will someday soon tell me that he no longer
needs his dad to sing him nighttime lullabies. When that happens, I will be
sad and this loss but take comfort that he's ready to move to another level
of maturity.
We may have reached one of those "happy/sad" times in our
movement. I have taken such great comfort - I now realize far too much
comfort - from the support of our supportive straight allies, particularly
those in CovNet. Now we must see CovNet's support for its paternalism and
the relatively safe position from which they operate. I am still happy for
their past support and expect we can still find occasions where our
interests coincide. I no longer find their supportive lullaby sufficient,
however, to offset the "we know what's best" words that go with it.
It's time for us to grow up and to make CovNet understand
that - in as much as they think it appropriate to protect GLBT people from
themselves - they are wrong.
Brian
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Doug,
I am sorry that you feel betrayed by your allies and I
fear that I will say nothing to you to ease that pain. If I had been a
voting member of your presbytery, I would also have voted no action.
Let me explain.
I was a minister member to the 213th GA where we made that
unbelievably faithful attempt to rid ourselves of a thorn in our side - B. I
served on committee 6 and found untapped reserves to bring the motion to the
floor. I could do it because IT WAS TIME. It was GOD'S time. I will go to my
grave believing that what we did in Louisville had the fingerprints of the
Spirit all over it.
I am not so sure that we can make that time happen again
without listening carefully for the Spirit's leading. This is not an excuse
to sit back and give up - by no means! It is a time to listen, listen,
listen. To let the anti inclusion forces hoist themselves on their own
petards as they argue for obedience to a policy that is impossible to
uphold. To allow the large middle of the church to make that tidal change
and swell the ranks of voices calling for B's eventual defeat. To challenge
the fear mongering from the "other side" and walk in a way that claims and
rejoices in God's peace for all people.
God's time isn't our time and it is hard to ask people to
continue to wait but wait we must or we run the risk of sacrificing all. MLK
Jr. died not seeing what his actions brought about - and, truth be told, I
wonder sometimes just how far we've come - but I believe that the mountain
top is within reach! Maybe, just maybe, now is the time to sit in our tents
at base camp and plan our ascension while the winds howl outside.
Eventually, they'll blow themselves out.
I am not happy to write this, but you did want to hear
from others and I hope that you will receive my response in the Spirit in
which it is offered.
Your sister in Christ and in the struggle,
Molly Douthett
Miami (OH) Presbytery
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Mr King,
I followed a link from the
http://www.layman.org/ website to the
Witherspoon site and your article re Lesbigay matters.
I am an Australian and so it really is none of my
business, but then I am a Presbyterian and like my fellow ministers here in
Australia, I do care about fidelity to the Word of God. I'm sure you know
all the Scripture texts (Genesis 1:27,28, 2:24; Lev 18:22, 20:13; Romans 2,
etc). Do you ever wonder that you might be held personally accountable one
day by God for condoning homosexual activity and even encouraging others in
such a lifestyle? Sometimes the greatest act of love is actually to say to a
person, "you shouldn't be doing that, you are harming yourself, you are
disobeying God's express command, but in Christ there is forgiveness and
power for living in God honouring ways, and we as a Church want to help you
in this".
More power to the Confessing Church movement in the PCUSA!
Rev DJ Palmer
a minister in the Presbyterian Church of Australia
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Added on 1-16-03
Dear Mr. King,
I did not expect to send you a note agreeing with the
Witherspoon Society on anything, but for what it's worth I think you are
right that there should have been an up-or-down vote on G-6.0106b at the
Twin Cities Presbytery meeting. It is either correct to keep this provision,
or it is correct to remove it. G-6.0106b is a very important question to
both sides of the PC(USA), and it should not be put aside with a "no action"
vote. The Covenant Network considers G-6.0106b to be a grave injustice ...
so why would they not try to remove it now rather than later? The position
of the Witherspoon Society is at least more internally consistent, albeit a
position I disagree with.
Sincerely,
John Erthein
Pastor, Elderton Presbyterian Church
Elderton, PA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks to all who have written, and others who have
called.
We'd like to hear from you, too.
Just send a note,
and unless you tell us otherwise, we'll share it here.