|
| |
|
The 215th GA:
"Living Faithfully with Families in
Transition" |
| Also --
Dr. Gloria Albrecht, who served
as a consultant to the committee that drafted "Living Faithfully with
Families in Transition," offers a careful, reasoned response to
criticisms leveled by Dr. Don Browning and his colleagues in the
Marriage Movement. |
"Living Faithfully with Families in Transition" offers Biblical
and other insights into the many forms of family life today
by Barbara Gaddis
[4-15-03]
The 209th General Assembly
(1997) handed the Advisory Committee on Social Witness Policy a daunting
task when it asked for a paper to "examine the issue of changing families
and the social structures that support families, with a particular focus on
the impact of these changes on children."
A five year process of Task Force deliberation, Synod
Consultation, and editing has produced a carefully drawn, theologically
sound, Biblically informed, sociologically relevant document that at it's
heart bids the church to exit the cultural warfare over so-called family
values, and embrace, value, support and nurture the family of the
twenty-first century in its variety of forms. The report does not take
strident positions on one side or the other of the political spectrum.
Instead, it presents a well-reasoned case for social policies that provide
increased time for family life, adequate family-sustaining wages for all
families, and reduced economic and consumer pressure on families. Further,
it asks the PCUSA to renew its commitment to resisting forces that weaken
family well-being, including materialism, consumerism, individualism, and
discrimination based on race, gender, class, age, disability or sexual
orientation.
All of these policy recommendations flow from four bedrock theological
affirmations based on a careful study of the Hebrew and Christian
Scriptures, and the Reformed confessions. First, that family life in a
variety of forms is integral to human life. Second, that the Biblical
tradition portrays God as working through diverse family structures. Third,
that as important as family life is, the biblical tradition makes clear that
one ought not promote one's own family over the well-being of others. And
fourth, that by grace the church is called to live on the edge of social
change, by calling the society to account for its treatment of families.
There are several compelling sections of the full report, worthy of a
careful read. First, the stories at the beginning of the full report outline
real life accounts of real families known to those involved in the writing
of the report. At once endearing and frustrating, the stories make clear the
social and economic problems facing families in the new century. The stories
also signal that this report will not only be about the white middle class;
there are sixteen stories that encompass a variety of family experiences
across ethnic, cultural, economic, and racial lines. At the end of each
paragraph, the reader is asked to consider two questions, "What should be
the response of a just society? What should be the response of the Family of
God?"
Second, throughout the report prayers are offered for the entire human
family, for the church, for families, for children, for faithfulness, for
redemption in failure, for healing, for vision. These prayers draw the
reader from statistics and research to spiritual reflection, enriching the
experience of reading the paper.
Third, using the best historical-critical methods and sources, the section
on the Bible and the Confessions highlights what is known and unknown about
God's intention for contemporary families. In quick fashion the report
disposes of the notion that there is one and only one way God envisions
families, laying aside the often idealized two-parent-two-child-mom-at
home-dad-at-work family to embrace a fuller understanding of the Biblical
and confessional accounts of God's work through varieties of family forms.
The bulk of the paper presents sociological, economic and anthropological
data regarding contemporary U.S. families and how those data have changed or
not changed over the past 30 to 50 years. It examines changing gender roles,
divorce, single parents, teen-aged parents, step families, foster families,
unmarried couples, families of one, couples of different faith traditions
and ethnicities, families with members who need special care, employment,
unemployment rates and distribution of income by race, and same sex
families. Woven through the discussion is the impact of all these changes on
the well-being of children.
"Living Faithfully with Families in Transition" will not please everyone.
For example, the report carefully sidesteps the issue of endorsing same-sex
families (citing the lack of consensus within the church), while challenging
the church and society not to stigmatize or harm the children of these
families. Conversely, the report refuses to endorse any family form as
better than any other family form, citing Biblical, confessional, and
sociological evidence that God is at work, and that children can be nurtured
and raised well, in many family forms, if those families are supported by
fair economic practices, by living wages, and by the faith community.
Finally, "Living Faithfully with Families in Transition" recommends the
adoption of "A Vision for Family Ministries," a document based on the
1988-1992 work of the Presbyterian Mariners and others, that outlines ideas
and principles to aid congregations in supporting and nurturing and
advocating for the variety of twenty-first century families. In concise and
poetic fashion "A Vision for Family Ministries" functions as a mission
statement for the Church's work with families, and a summary of the report.
"Living Faithfully with Families in Transition" will be debated by committee
07, National Issues.
The author
The Rev. Dr. Barbara Gaddis is a family counselor in
Boone, Iowa; she chaired the task force that drafted the report on "Living
Faithfully with Families in Transition"
Is it time for a Parents' Bill of Rights?
[5-8-03]The report on
"Living Faithfully with Families in Transition" is being
attacked by many on the Right who view it as an attack on what they perceive
as the single form of family life ordained by God.
But if folks are really anxious to "defend the family,"
perhaps the greatest threat today comes not from the changing forms of
family life, but from the pressures of our market economy, directed at our
children through advertising.
A long article by Jonathan Rowe and Gary
Ruskin, published in Mothering Magazine (Jan/Feb 2003) explains in
detail the reasoning behind the "Parents' Bill of Rights."
|
Other opinions:
The right side of the Presbyterian Church is responding to
the world with various degrees of criticism. Some samples:
 | On
The Layman Online, John H. Adams has blasted the report as ignoring
scripture (especially Paul) and committing other errors.
|
 | The
Presbyterian Forum offers a helpful précis of the document, and lists
"some likely point of disagreement among Presbyterians."
|
 | Terry Schlossberg of
Presbyterians
Pro-Life says, "The policy, if adopted, will put the PC(USA) on record
officially sanctioning every deviant form of family, thus redefining
family altogether. It will erase the significance of marriage to healthy
family life." |
|
| |
| |
|
A major
Ghost Ranch event this summer!
July 28 - August 3, 2008
Paths toward Peace and Justice:
Spirituality, Earth-Care, and the Prophetic Word in a time of
Violence
More info >> |
| |
|
If you like what you find here,
we hope you'll help us keep this website going ... and growing!
Please consider making a special contribution --
large or small -- to help us continue and improve this service.
Click
here to send a gift online, using your credit card, through
PayPal.
Or send your check, made out to
"Witherspoon Society" and marked "web site," to our Witherspoon
Bookkeeper:
Susan Robertson
9650 Clover Circle
Eden Prairie, MN 55347 |
| |
|
An index of
our reports
from
BECOMING NEIGHBORS:
An Invitation
to Global Discipleship
A Witherspoon conference
on global mission and justice
September 16 - 19, 2007
Louisville, Kentucky |
| |
|
Check out our report from the
Conference
on
Terror, Torture,
and Security |
| |
|