Fear and loathing in Iraqi prisons / Abu Ghraib
by Doug King [5-8-04]
As your WebWeaver, I generally try to confine my efforts
to editing (OK, with a little editorializing around the edges) and managing
this website.
But today I feel compelled to go beyond that, and to offer
a few very sketchy reflections on the awful revelations of the past week -
with more promised for the days ahead. My intent is not to offer any
conclusive analysis, but to suggest a few connections with things we have
posted and discussed over the past few months, and specifically to point to
a few theological issues that cry out for attention.
Whose fault is it?
The blame game is well under way. The soldiers and
Military Police were ill-prepared for the tasks assigned to them. They were
afraid. They just didn't recognize about "the enemy" as human beings. They
were just acting under orders from the intelligence personnel. Rumsfeld
should resign. It's the President who is ultimately responsible.
We may want to say Yes to all of the above, but I suspect
there are deeper problems. In an excellent article that we posted in March,
"Christians Must Challenge American Messianic
Nationalism: A Call to the Churches," Rosemary Radford Ruether says that
our current wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been depicted by the Bush
administration, and most clearly by the President himself, "as if they were
episodes in an apocalyptic drama of good against evil, angels of light
against the forces of darkness, God's chosen people against God's enemies."
Undergirding this holy war, she says, are four false
theological assumptions: That "God chooses one nation above all other
nations." That "the United States is God's uniquely chosen nation." That
"evil is socially located in the enemies of the United States." And that
"evil can be conquered by external coercion, ultimately by military force."
Based on these assumptions, the U.S. government has
operated with blithe disregard for the delicate system of rules and
agreements that have been developed over the past few decades as a way to
keep the world from destroying itself. So we have viewed agreements to limit
global warming and nuclear arms as applying to everyone else, but not to us.
We have dismissed the UN as irrelevant - at least until things start falling
apart and we need to cover our tails.
Further, by drawing a clear line between good and evil, we
have made it easy, if not imperative, to treat the "bad guys" as indeed
evil, and therefore not just less than human, but anti-human. Inhuman
treatment is justified, it seems, for those who not human.
Finally, the President seems to have seized upon the terrible acts of 9/11
as a grand political tool: an inspirer of fear in the American people that
has justified many actions and policies that would probably have been
rejected otherwise. So if the guards in Abu Ghraib have indeed been
motivated by fear, they're just responding as we've all been taught over the
past couple years.
In a culture of anxiety and a world divided into good and
evil, their actions make perfect sense.
This does not mean the perpetrators of these
crimes are really innocent. But it does mean that the question of
guilt and responsibility is far more broad and for more complex.
If Christians are to offer any redemptive insights in this
deeply troubled time, we must begin there: The real problems are deep. They
are at base rooted in bad theology, as Dr. Ruether so clearly outlined it
for us. We face a challenge today, to offer a prophetic witness to authentic
faith and point the way toward authentic living in the world.
One final thought: In his testimony on Friday, the Secretary of Defense
seemed to indicate repeatedly that for him the real issue is not what was
done to prisoners completely under American control. The issue was that
somebody took pictures, and showed them to the world. And for many of the
congressional questioners the concern was not "How did this happen?" It was
not "Why wasn't the President informed when the first hints of trouble began
emerging back in January - or even earlier?" No, the concern was "Why wasn't
the President told when you knew there were photos?" These are all
legitimate questions, but we as a nation must finally face the deeper
questions: How could we (not "they," but "we") have done such
things?
And of course then, What can we do to change that culture
of fear, that view of a good-vs.-evil world, to prevent those things from
happening again?
School of the Americas Watch has offered some simple,
immediate suggestions. We might start there.
And let's talk!
If you have comments about this little
exploration I'd love to hear them.
If you have ideas of your own, or can suggest other resources, let us know!
Just send a
note!