Presbyterian Voices for Justice 

A union of The Witherspoon Society and Voices of Sophia

Welcome to news and networking for progressive Presbyterians 

Home page Marriage Equality Global & Social concerns    
News of the PC(USA) Immigrant rights Israel & Palestine
U S Politics, 2010-11 Inclusive ordination Wars in Iraq & Afghanistan
Occupy Wall Street The Economic Crisis Other churches, other faiths
    About us         Join us! Health Care Reform Archive
Just for fun Confronting torture Notes from your WebWeaver

What's Where

Our reports about the 219th General Assembly, July 2010

ABOUT US

The Winter 2011 issue of
Network News
is posted here
- in Adobe PDF format.

Click here for earlier issues
Adobe PDF  Click here to download (free!) Adobe Reader software to view this and all PDF files.

News of Presbyterian Voices for Justice
How to join us

CONNECTIONS

Coming events calendar 

Do you want to announce an event?
Please send a note!
Food for the spirit
Book notes

Go to  Amazon.com

LINKS

NEWS of the Presbyterian Church

Got news??
Send us a note!
Social and global concerns
The U.S. political scene, 2010-11
The Middle East conflict
Uprising in Egypt
The economic crisis
Health care reform
Working for inclusive ordination
Peacemaking & international concerns
The Wars in Iraq & Afghanistan
Israel, Palestine, and Gaza
U. S. Politics
Election 2008
Economic justice
Fair Food Campaign
Labor rights
Women's Concerns
Sexual justice
Marriage Equality
Caring for the environment
Immigrant rights
Racial concerns
Church & State
The death penalty
The media
OTHER CHURCHES, OTHER FAITHS
Do you want regular e-mail updates when stories are added to our web site?
Just send a note!
The WebWeaver's Space
ARCHIVES
JUST FOR FUN
Want books?
Search Now:

 

Berry Craig:   WSLCD?

WSLCD?

By Berry Craig

[5-23-05]

Click here for a critical comment.



"Nice guys finish last," baseball Hall of Famer Leo Durocher said of the National Pastime's good sports.

Liberal Christians are nice guys. The Religious Right is clobbering them.

Liberal Christians either don't fight back, or they pull punches. They like to quote Voltaire, the famous French philosopher who supposedly said, "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

On the other hand, Religious Rightists neither ask for, not give, quarter as they smite liberal Christians with the "sword of the Lord." They pretty much dismiss liberal Christians -- liberals, period -- as hell-bound heathens.

"To a lot of fundamentalists," Bruce Bawer wrote in Stealing Jesus: How Fundamentalism Betrays Christianity, "God's love just isn't any fun unless you can find somebody else to deny it to."

Admittedly, conservative Christendom isn't monolithic. Not all "conservative Christians" believe their liberal brothers and sisters in Christ will end up sizzling with Satan.

Many conservative Christians aren't fundamentalists. Many, too, are draft dodgers in the Religious Right's verbal holy war against liberal Christianity. I know some conservative Christians who even vote Democratic.

Nonetheless, fundamentalist Religious Rightists think they are the future of American Christianity. The election of President George W. Bush and a host of other "family values" Republicans proves that "mainline" churches (including the PCUSA) are now "sideline" churches, a Religious Right leader recently bragged.

The Religious Right's strongest selling point seems to be certainty in an uncertain world. "God said it. I believe it. That settles it," is a popular Religious Right bumper sticker.

Liberal Christians may dismiss bumper sticker theology as glib. But everybody wants easy answers to hard questions. What could be simpler than "Trust Jesus," another well-traveled Religious Right bumper sticker slogan?

Liberal Christians believe in the old Social Gospel, which held that instead of focusing solely on the afterlife, Christians should help the poor and powerless in the here-and-now.

The Religious Right concentrates on the hereafter, preaching yet another simple but effective message: What is a short earthly life, no matter how difficult, compared to eternal bliss with Jesus in Heaven?

"Don't be fooled by this car. My reward is in Heaven" is another common Religious Right bumper sticker, especially on rusty old cars.

Religious Rightists' other big incentive for coming to Jesus is, of course, the unpleasant alternative: everlasting perdition. "Accept Jesus and live forever. Reject Jesus and burn forever" warns a series of hand-made, Burma Shave-style road signs near my old Kentucky home.

Liberal Christians question the tenets of their faith, a process which they see as healthy exercise for the soul. They think no belief system is worth anything if it can't withstand the challenge of difficult questions.

Liberal Christians believe that thoughtful, prayerful introspection is an essential part of their spirituality. As a result, liberal Christians don't promise easy answers to hard questions. Liberals offer nothing like the Religious Right's "repent or roast" message.

But here's a chink in the opposition's armor: simple might work in the short term, but is "God said it. I believe it. That settles it" long-term nourishment for the soul?

Human beings are by nature questioning critters. God made us so. The Creator gave the human animal, and no other organism, a brain capable of critical thought.

Religious rightists condemn critical thought as dangerous and "worldly." Could it be that deep down inside, the likes of the Revs. Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell and James Dobson really fear their theology can't stand up to critical thought?

Here's a pair of posers for Religious Rightists: If God didn't want people to think critically, why did the Almighty wire us for critical thought? Since God gave us the power to think and reason, wouldn't thinking and reasoning be a good way to worship God?

Critical thought leads to tolerance, another plus among liberal Christians. Unlike those on the Religious Right, liberal Christians don't claim theirs is the only water. That's scriptural, too. "Judge not, lest ye be judged," the Good Book says.

But judge the Religious Right does, in churches and on campaign trails. The Religious Right has wedded itself to the Republican Right. Both groups have made "Christian" and "political conservative" synonyms to many Americans.

The Religious Right would have Americans believe that the Bible supports laissez-faire capitalism, the Republican Right's most cherished belief. The Religious Right acts as if GOP stands for "God's Own Party."

Thus, Democratic U.S. Senators -- the majority of them Christians -- who object to Bush's judicial nominees are "against people of faith." "You can't be a Christian and a Democrat" and "You can't be a Christian and a liberal" are stock charges from GOP Christian soldiers in the Bluegrass State, and I suspect elsewhere.

The "Patriot Pastors" are among the GOP's newest shock troops. "Patriotism," observed the eminent 18th-century English critic Samuel Johnson, "is the last refuge of a scoundrel."

Okay, quoting Samuel Johnson might sound like sour grapes to Religious Right preachers who boast of their "mega-churches." Some of these clerics barely hide their glee at the empty pews in "liberal" churches on Sunday mornings.

So WSLCD? (What Should Liberal Christians Do?)

Most importantly, liberal Christians ought to make it clear they too are "Bible-Believing Christians." Just as the Republican Right has hijacked the Stars and Stripes, Religious Rightists have stolen "Bible-Believing Christian" for themselves. The implication is obvious -- only Religious Right Christians believe in the Bible.

But in the Good Book, Jesus:

-- admonishes us to do unto others as we would have others do unto us.

-- says the meek, not the moneyed, shall inherit the earth.

-- runs the moneychangers out of the temple.

The Bible is also plain that wherever He went, Jesus preached love over hate, peace over war, charity over greed, and brotherhood and sisterhood over bigotry and exclusion.

Thus, liberal Christians ought to be asking Religious Right Christians to show us where in the Bible Christ preached religious or political conservatism. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying "You can't be a Christian and a Republican" or "You can't be a Christian and a conservative."

But based on scripture, I don't see the Son of God as a right-wing Republican Social Darwinist or union-buster. I don't see Christ joining the GOP chorus in opposing worker safety and health and environmental protection laws because such measures, too, might cost Him a few extra bucks.

I can't imagine Christ railing against "welfare cheats," running up a Rebel flag and cozying with the GOP's neo-Confederate wing. Nor do I believe Jesus would bash gays, the Religious and Republican Right's demons du jour. I can't envision the Prince of Peace making like the president, who got in the National Guard to get out of the Vietnam war and yet sent young men and women off to fight and maybe die in Iraq with a cheeky, "Let's Roll."

So gimme that old time religion -- the liberal faith that inspired abolitionists, suffragettes, and farmer, labor, civil rights, women's rights and peace activists. Liberal Christians have been at the forefront of every important reform movement in U.S. history.

Make that Liberal Bible-Believing Christians.

-- Berry Craig is a professor of history at the West Kentucky Community and Technical College in Paducah. He and his wife, Melinda, are members of the Witherspoon Society.

Got comments? 
Please send a note to be shared here!

A reader criticizes Berry Craig’s views of "fundamentalists"
   [6-1-05]

I am a Presbyterian (PCA), I’m a layperson, and probably fall into the most disgusting categories by Berry Craig. What his article seems like to me is simply a classic theologically liberal view of everything, and of course that has gone over into his view of history, puritans, etc. The problem starts with ones Epistemology. How does one know what one knows? To what do we appeal? Do we look at the Bible alone, the Bible + history, all of the above under our reason? Is our own reason equivalent to all of the above? What liberalism does, is to place all things under mans personal reason, meaning that mans reason is the ultimate authority, and so all things are judged by it. This is where Craig’s statements about so called "Fundamentalists" views: "prove less than soul-nourishing", why he does not like Puritans, etc. It is at the crux of all of his own personal theology, and consternation. It is this: "Who defines reality"? The dichotomy of thought here is that theological liberalism sits over the word of God, and judges it according to the dictates of a mans own reason, where as fundamentalism, puritans, many theologians of the past (Calvin, Knox, etc) sit under the Word of God, all the while reasoning, but in a humble dependent state, waiting and leaning on the Holy Spirit to know truth. At question is whether mans mind is also fallen Jer 17 says that the heart of man is desperately wicked, Romans speaking of exchanges of the truth of God for a lie. This is the charge the Word of God brings against the liberal epistemology: That they have "exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man", and in doing so have "exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator" (Romans 1:23,25)

Steve White

 

 

Visit our lively
new website!

GA actions ratified (or not) by  the presbyteries   

A number of the most important actions of the 219th General Assembly have now been acted upon by the presbyteries, confirming most of them as amendments to the PC(USA) Book of Order.

We provided resources to help inform the reflection and debate, along with updates on the voting.

Our three areas of primary interest have been:

bullet Amendment 10-A, which  removes the current ban on lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender persons being considered as possible candidates for ordination as elder or ministers.  Approved!

bullet Amendment 10-2, which would add the Belhar Confession to our Book of Confessions.  Disapproved, because as an amendment to the Book of Confessions it needed a 2/3 vote, and did not receive that.

bullet Amendment 10-1, which  adopts the new Form of Government that was approved by the Assembly.   Approved.
 

If you like what you find here,
we hope you'll help us keep Voices for Justice going ... and growing!

Please consider making a special contribution -- large or small -- to help us continue and improve this service.

Click here to send a gift online, using your credit card, through PayPal.

Or send your check, made out to "Presbyterian Voices for Justice" and marked "web site," to our PVJ Treasurer:

Darcy Hawk
4007 Gibsonia Road
Gibsonia, PA  15044-8312

 

Some blogs worth visiting

PVJ's Facebook page

Mitch Trigger, PVJ's Secretary/Communicator, has created a Facebook page where Witherspoon members and others can gather to exchange news and views. Mitch and a few others have posted bits of news, both personal and organizational. But there’s room for more!

You can post your own news and views, or initiate a conversation about a topic of interest to you.

 

Voices of Sophia blog

Heather Reichgott, who has created this new blog for Voices of Sophia, introduces it:

After fifteen years of scholarship and activism, Voices of Sophia presents a blog. Here, we present the voices of feminist theologians of all stripes: scholars, clergy, students, exiles, missionaries, workers, thinkers, artists, lovers and devotees, from many parts of the world, all children of the God in whose image women are made. .... This blog seeks to glorify God through prayer, work, art, and intellectual reflection. Through articles and ensuing discussion we hope to become an active and thoughtful community.

 

John Harris’ Summit to Shore blogspot

Theological and philosophical reflections on everything between summit to shore, including kayaking, climbing, religion, spirituality, philosophy, theology, politics, culture, travel, The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), New York City and the Queens neighborhood of Ridgewood by a progressive New York City Presbyterian Pastor. John is a former member of the Witherspoon board, and is designated pastor of North Presbyterian Church in Flushing, NY.

 

John Shuck’s Shuck and Jive

A Presbyterian minister, currently serving as pastor of First Presbyterian Church of Elizabethton, Tenn., blogs about spirituality, culture, religion (both organized and disorganized), life, evolution, literature, Jesus, and lightening up.

 

Got more blogs to recommend?

Please send a note, and we'll see what we can do!

 

To top

© 2011 by Presbyterian Voices for Justice.  All material on this site is the responsibility of the WebWeaver unless other sources are acknowledged.  Unless otherwise noted, material on this site may be copied for personal use and sharing in small groups.  For permission to reproduce material for wider publication, please contact the WebWeaver, Doug King.  Any material reached by links on this site is outside the control and responsibility of the WebWeaver and Presbyterian Voices for Justice.  Questions or comments?  Please send a note!