|
| |
| Santa Fe
overture 01-27 calls for freedom of conscience in dealing with G-6.0106b
[2-7-01]
Read an explanation of the reasons for
this overture.
On amending G-6.0108 by inserting a new
exemption/waiver clause for governing bodies in order to ensure balance
in the church between freedom of conscience with respect to
interpretation of Scripture and constitutional governance of the church.
The Presbytery of Santa Fe, meeting in regular
session, February 3, 2001, respectfully overtures the 213th
General Assembly (2001) to direct the Stated Clerk to send the following
proposed amendment to the Book of Order to the presbyteries for their
affirmative or negative vote:
Shall a new section G-6.0108d and G-6.0108e be added
which shall read:
6.0108d In order to respect two foundational
principles of the Reformed Faith (freedom of conscience with respect
to interpretation of scripture and constitutional governance of the
church), to acknowledge that there is selective recognition of
practices in the confessions of the church and in scripture which are
called sin, and to ensure that freedom of conscience is maintained
with regard to interpretation of scripture, when a governing body
determines it can not equitably and justly apply the requirements of
G-6.106b, it may seek a waiver from those requirements from the next
more inclusive governing body. The governing body may grant a waiver
by a majority vote for a period of no more than three years. The
waiver shall be subject to renewal or to revocation at any time by a
majority vote of the governing body. Should revocation of the waiver
occur, any person then holding office shall not be affected during the
current term of office, and since ordination to office is perpetual,
no one can lay it aside at pleasure or be divested of it except as
provided in the Rules of Discipline.
6.0108e Paragraph d above may not be amended
within 10 years following its adoption by a majority of the
presbyteries.
Rationale
- It is a very delicate balance to respect at the
same time both freedom of conscience with respect to interpretation
of scripture and constitutional governance of the church;
- There is the risk that in the interest of
constitutional governance of the church, freedom of conscience will
be denied;
- There is the equal risk that in the name of freedom
of conscience with respect to interpretation of scripture,
constitutional governance of the church will be compromised;
- The historic Presbyterian response to this dilemma
has been to permit waivers under certain circumstances. This
provision for a waiver would help restore a climate of civility and
integrity in the church while maintaining that balance between
freedom of conscience with respect to interpretation of scripture
and constitutional governance of the church;
- This provision would help provide an openness in
coming to terms with our differences and in respecting different
points of view, especially theological points of view and differing
points of view on the interpretation of scripture, without
stereotyping or shunning people who think, believe, look, or act
differently.
- From the revisions of Westminster in 1902 through
decisions of the General Assembly rejecting the "five
fundamentals" and fundamentalism in the 1920s and 1930s to the
Confession of '67, the Presbyterian Church has resisted a rigidity
which would bind the conscience of believer on nonessentials of the
faith.
- At the time of the reunion in 1983, in the interest
of integrity in the constitutional governance of the church, an
exemption was granted those congregations which could not or had not
ordained women (after 15 years, the exemption was lifted as the
church became more of one mind concerning the ordination of women);
- Currently, G-14.0202a(1), in the interest of
integrity in the constitutional governance of the church, allows a
waiver for congregations from the requirement which calls for
election to office of "men and women from among its
members;"
- As votes on various amendments in recent years have
demonstrated, the mind of the church is sharply divided on the
provisions of G-1.0106b for any number of reasons. The provision of
waivers would help preserve the unity of the church in the name of
freedom of conscience with respect to interpretation of scripture
and constitutional governance of the church;
- Because there is no relief from the requirements of
G-6.0106b except through disobedience and/or leaving the church, the
church is using valuable resources of money, time, and energy in
judicial procedure and/or endless debate. At the same time, it is
losing the God-given gifts for service to Christ and Christ's church
of countless faithful men and women who in good conscience cannot
agree with the provisions of G-1.0106b because of its graceless
rigidity and harshness;
- This provision for waiver would provide a means for
the church to tolerate certain procedures in the church which many
find unacceptable while at the same time not endorsing or approving
those procedures.
|
| The Reformed understanding of the freedom
of conscience has been discussed as presbyteries have debated
Amendment O, but is a matter of far broader import. For one thing,
numerous overtures to the 213th General Assembly deal with
G-6.0106b on the basis of conscience. Dr. Sarah Melcher looks at
Calvin's Institutes to help us consider this issue. [3-13-01] |
| The Layman
won't like this. Check out
their recent editorial on the need to limit the freedom of
conscience. |
| |
| |
|
If you like what you find here,
we hope you'll help us keep this website going ... and growing!
Please consider making a special contribution --
large or small -- to help us continue and improve this service.
Click
here to send a gift online, using your credit card, through
PayPal.
Or send your check, made out to
"Witherspoon Society" and marked "web site," to our Witherspoon
Bookkeeper:
Susan Robertson
9650 Clover Circle
Eden Prairie, MN 55347 |
| |
|
An index of
our reports
from
BECOMING NEIGHBORS:
An Invitation
to Global Discipleship
A Witherspoon conference
on global mission and justice
September 16 - 19, 2007
Louisville, Kentucky |
| |
|
Check out our report from the
Conference
on
Terror, Torture,
and Security |
| |
|